Customize your website

Drug testing-what's the deal?



USW President George Kean

USW President George Kean

Michelle Stewart
Published on May 3rd, 2010
Published on July 14th, 2010
Michelle Stewart RSS Feed

Union says policy is incomplete and too vague

As the Iron Ore Company of Canada makes moves towards mandatory drug testing of workers on its project, the Steelworkers want an awful lot more information before the policy gets the nod from the union.

"There was a hearing a couple of weeks ago before an arbitrator on this issue and we should hear something back in a couple of weeks," said George Kean, president of the Local 5795 USW. "What I want to say, first off is, the Steelworkers have zero tolerance, zero tolerance, for alcohol and drug use in the workplace.

Topics :
Steelworkers , Local 5795 USW , IOC

As the Iron Ore Company of Canada makes moves towards mandatory drug testing of workers on its project, the Steelworkers want an awful lot more information before the policy gets the nod from the union.

"There was a hearing a couple of weeks ago before an arbitrator on this issue and we should hear something back in a couple of weeks," said George Kean, president of the Local 5795 USW. "What I want to say, first off is, the Steelworkers have zero tolerance, zero tolerance, for alcohol and drug use in the workplace. And, if we knew of and were aware of any of our members using or under the influence of drugs or alcohol in the workplace we would go in and remove them from the workplace and give them any assistance necessary."

Incomplete policy

Kean said he has many questions surrounding the process the company wants to implement, questions, he said, he cannot get answers to.

"It's inconceivable that an employer would come out with a policy that's incomplete and employees don't know what to expect," said the union boss. "We are getting these questions [from the membership] and we have no answers to give them. When we ask the company they say, 'we don't know yet' so that's disappointing."

Kean says the union has issues with the company bringing in a policy such as drug testing and the concern comes from the relationships between employees and management on the IOC project.

Favourtism issues

"There has been favouritism in the workplace and employees being treated in a disrespectful manner," Kean explained. "When, for example, employees bringing up concerns and speaking out about safety issues, they are put on the worst piece of equipment out there. Our issue with this drug testing is we want to make sure it's done fairly and without intimidation for our members. Your team leader could be sending you for a drug test just to keep you from complaining about safety issues. Our fear was this would be used to keep employees quiet rather than deal with employees that were actually under the influence of drugs and alcohol."

The union leader said the workplace has team leaders showing favouritism and less regard is being shown to senior members.

"For the past 50 years, for example, if new equipment came on the mine [site], it was always given to the senior operators with respect to their knowledge and experience," he said. "Today it's given to whomever the team leader likes best. To the one who complains less, so if you are senior but you complain about safety, you don't get things like this. We have brought this up to the top of IOC about the favouritism that's shown in there and it is an intimidation that causes stress in the workplace. It's just not a fair way of doing things."

Kean says this is a legitimate complaint and more than 500 grievances filed lends credibility to management's disregard towards his membership and the collective agreement.

Okay for the new

All new employees (including summer students) having hair follicle testing as well as contract workers having to pass the same test are not a concern to Kean.

"No, we have no problem with that," he said. "We are disputing random testing of people already in there for a number of reasons. We don't know what type of testing they will be doing and another thing, there is no team leader in there qualified."

Kean said it hasn't been outlined what is considered under the influence and how much is considered unacceptable in whatever drug test, or what drug.

"If a fellow, for example, had a toke a month ago, we don't know if that will be held against him," Kean explained. "We don't know what signs they will be looking for. They came out with a [drug testing] policy that is not finished, so how can we agree to it when we don't know what kind of testing will be done for employees on site?"

Kean says he can't say there's been serious issues with drugs on the worksite and maintains in 50 years drugs or alcohol have not be linked to any accidents or tragedies in the workplace.

George Kean, president of USW Local 5795, says the union has an issue with IOC bringing in a drug testing policy simply because there are too many unanswered questions ranging from what type of testing will be done to who will be implementing it.

All new employees (including summer students) having hair follicle testing as well as contract workers having to pass the same test are not a concern to Kean.

"No, we have no problem with that," he said. "We are disputing random testing of people already in there for a number of reasons. We don't know what type of testing they will be doing and another thing, there is no team leader in there qualified."

Kean said it hasn't been outlined what is considered under the influence and how much is considered unacceptable in whatever drug test, or what drug.

"If a fellow, for example, had a toke a month ago, we don't know if that will be held against him," Kean explained. "We don't know what signs they will be looking for. They came out with a [drug testing] policy that is not finished, so how can we agree to it when we don't know what kind of testing will be done for employees on site?"

Kean says he can't say there's been serious issues with drugs on the worksite and maintains in 50 years drugs or alcohol have not be linked to any accidents or tragedies in the workplace.

Comments

  • Username
    Bill
    - July 14th, 2010 at 11:48:27

    To A Workers Voice .

    Did you read the article? The Union says they have no problem with pre-employment D&A testing. Then the first thing you say is Just try to enter a oilsands site and not be subjected to pre-access D&A screening and see how far you get. You will be shown the gate leaving the site.

    I have been allowed on oilsands sites in Alberta without a D&A test. It all depends on how bad they need you. But yes 90% of all workers coming on site do a D&A test, and not even the unions have an issue with this. Some plants only require a letter from the company you work for, stating that you have done a D&A test in the last 30 days. And I have worked for companies that will give you that letter even if you haven't done a test in a year. This is a fact, it has happened to me.

    I think George Kean has a legitimate concern. Favoritism is a big issue at IOC. If you don't believe me, go work there and you will see what I'm talking about. This isn't about post-incident testing. It's about a leader getting back or intimidating an employee who he/she knows might have had a toke last weekend.

    Also, D&A testing lowers the companies insurance rates. They save money. Plain and simple.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Steven
    - July 14th, 2010 at 11:48:23

    Ideally drug testing sounds like a great idea. However, after working for years in a zero tolerence site I have learned that the testing causes more headaches than anything. Drugs and alcohol have never been a leading factor in workplace injury, it usually boils down to poor training and inexperience that causes injury, not whether or not someone had a beer or toke on their days off. And I am so sick of being threatened by people at work. I have had people threaten to put drugs in my coffee or lunch several time usually because I am getting more overtime work or I was picked for a job that they wanted. I now have to keep my lunches in my locker it is ridiculous. i am considering quitting even though the pay is good it's just so annoying and frustrating.I was for the testing before. I have now changed my mind. Some of the best workers we have occasionally have a beer or smoke a joint, as long as they don't come to work high or drunk they are no more unsafe then the people using prescription drugs.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Mike
    - July 14th, 2010 at 11:48:23

    I didn't have enough hair to do the test so they did not hire me. This was Wabush Mines.Seems pretty unfair to me.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    just another opinion
    - July 14th, 2010 at 11:48:18

    i have worked in at a mine site where there was no drug testing and wish there had been as there was so much drugs been used on site, now i work where there is drug testing, i have seen so many lives ruined, because now instead of a joint on days of because it stays in ur system for a month , they have gone to the use of coke cause that leaves ur system in 36 hrs, so in my opnion there is good and bad with those tests

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    A Workers
    - July 14th, 2010 at 11:48:16

    If the union has what it states a zero tolerance policy, then whats the problem? Just try to enter a oilsands site and not be subjected to pre-access D&A screening and see how far you get. You will be shown the gate leaving the site.

    Post incident D&A testing should also be a no brainier. If the membership is clean, then they will all pass right?

    So settle down and get with the program. I do not want to be working around someone that might be under the influence, do you?

    The urine test is enough. This hair thing goes a little too far IMHO though. Too many variables that can be obtained through these tests that are not work related.

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Aurora is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

loading...

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Aurora Twitter

Advertising